Critical Values is the go-to resource for the entire laboratory team, providing insight and information on the latest research, information, and issues within pathology and laboratory medicine. The print and online magazine invites submissions on topics including, but not limited to, advocacy, education, technology, global health, workforce, workplace best practices, and leadership.
E. Blair Holladay, PhD, MASCP, SCT(ASCP)CM
Chief Executive Officer
Molly Strzelecki Editor
Susan Montgomery Contributing Editor
Martin Tyminski Creative Director
Jennifer Brinson Art Direction and Design
Laboratory leaders today not only have to navigate more complex demands of running a laboratory, they also must adapt to a world changed by the COVID-19 pandemic and emerging technologies.
In addition, navigating a wave of retiring boomers and inducting in younger generations of laboratory professionals, leadership in today’s laboratory may look a bit different than it did a few years ago. Experts explain why an empathetic approach to leadership can help leaders guide laboratories confidently into the future.
You can’t assess the state of laboratory leadership over the last five years without acknowledging the pandemic, which has been a time of loss for many people, according to Dana Powell Baker, EdD, MBA, MS, CPH, MLS(ASCP)CM, President of the Society of Black Pathologists.
“People have been dealing with the loss of relationships, loss of jobs in some instances, and loss of wages, especially if they were out on extended sick leave,” Dr. Baker says.
This requires a greater need for “empathetic leadership, but also inclusive leadership,” she says.
She suggests leaders should ask, “Where can I be adaptable and inclusive and mindful of what my individual team members may be going through?” Baker says.
Most importantly, staff need to feel like they are receiving empathy from their leadership and being viewed as a human being first, she says.
Barbara Caldwell, MS, MASCP, MLS(ASCP)CMSHCM , a former administrative laboratory director, medical laboratory scientist and consultant, couldn’t agree more. She recently gave a presentation at KnowledgeLab 2024, called “Empathetic Leadership” in which she outlined three stages of empathy leaders need to be aware of:
Cognitive: Gathering data
Emotional: Engaging with and sharing your staff’s emotions, from the happiness to the suffering.
Compassionate: Putting into practice what you learn and asking how you can help
Ms. Caldwell says studies show that empathy goes a long way toward staff retention. She cited one study by the Center for Talent Innovation that found 71 percent of employees are more likely to stay with their current employer if their leadership demonstrates a high level of empathy. Yet as many as 50 percent of employees don’t feel that their leadership is empathetic or supportive.
Becoming a more empathetic leader, Dr. Baker suggests, requires a “self-inventory” because empathy may not come naturally to everyone. “Being able to lead diverse groups of individuals, you're going to have to call on different aspects of your personality or your attributes. If you feel like you have a gap or a lack of empathy for people, just having that level of self-awareness can allow you to act upon it through other approaches and resources,” she says.
Another piece of becoming an empathetic leader is to become more vulnerable. Dr. Baker recounts how her early models of leadership were often unwilling to admit to a lack of knowledge or skills or posing questions to others.
“By asking questions…by welcoming people in, you are engaging your team.”
Becoming more empathetic can, however, contribute to burnout if you’re not careful, Ms. Caldwell warns.
“Being empathetic makes you enter that emotional zone, and it can be an uncomfortable experience. Some leaders aren't even comfortable with their own emotions, let alone trying to deal with others,” she says.
You can even over-empathize with people who are more like you, which can lead to a breakdown in trust, she says. In a nutshell, becoming more empathetic in the right ways requires education or training.
“I don't think that people get that kind of training [in school],” Ms. Caldwell says. “I think we can all learn a lot more about taking our humanity and our humility to work.”
Laboratory leaders may also find themselves wearing more hats in the last five years, Dr. Baker says, including managing supply chain shortages, optimizing staff in the face of labor shortages, and handling higher volumes of testing.
Another result of the pandemic that has added complexity to laboratories in general, according to Sean Tucker, MLS(ASCP), MBA, Director of Laboratory Services at North Kansas City Hospital, is that “We are seeing much sicker patients and more complex disease states and are certainly concerned about microbial antibiotic resistance and treating patients who might have multiple infections.”
That means, leaders in today’s laboratory must keep up with emerging technologies, not only in the workflow of the laboratory itself, but in troubleshooting reimbursement issues. “We are all fighting for limited capital dollars. The laboratory is competing against other hospital initiatives to expand the Operating Room or bring in a new CT scanner. It is critical that lab leaders are informing the C-suite the value of these investments,” Mr. Tucker says. The challenges are more complex every year.
Mr. Tucker does not underestimate the lingering effects of the pandemic on people’s mental health, either. “I think that it can be a huge challenge for laboratory leaders to continue to encourage and manage their staff when they are struggling with mental illness and the pressure that comes with working in a fast-paced environment—high technology, high stakes—when we are understaffed.”
Indeed, Dr. Baker says this necessitates a greater need for self-care.
“Leaders get so immersed in putting out fires, addressing the needs of our teams, meeting the demands of what our leadership may be asking of us, that we forget to put the mask on ourselves first. A bittersweet part of the pandemic is that it really highlighted the need to really look at personal wellness and our own wellbeing,” she says.
In addition to that, Dr. Baker recommends advocating for professional development for yourself too. “Oftentimes we'll seek out opportunities for our teams, but we don't think about our own ongoing professional development that we need to support our growth and sustainability as leaders.”
Another challenge laboratory leaders are facing is adapting to the loss of experience as more baby boomers retire, ushering in a younger crop of laboratory professionals who have different needs and communication styles.
“We're starting to rely on policies and procedures more rather than experience and intuition,” Mr. Tucker says. “We’re working with a different generation who grew up only using technology, a field of instant information, instant recognition and gratification and has a different understanding of life versus work balance.”
He suggested that leaders will have to be able to be “agile” and respond to issues quickly to meet them where they are.
“One of the ways to do so is to allow them to be open, vulnerable, and vocal. That might not be comfortable for most leaders,” he explains. ‘Taking that time to allow someone to voice their opinions, whether they are valid or not, is the leader's responsibility. That creates a culture of inclusivity that allows someone to feel like they are participating in process improvement and getting them to take an active role.”
At the end of the day, however, Ms. Caldwell returns to empathy as the core of leadership strategies.
“Empathy is really about building trust and that's not so easy in our medical ecosystem. But if you really understand the thoughts and feelings of your team, and they know that you're there for them, it makes a difference.”